SSブログ

【論説】東電は福島原発の最終処理方針公表を:[追記] [論説]

東北関東巨大地震から既に10日を過ぎますが,どうも政府と東京電力の対応に大きな疑問を感ぜざるを得ません.

巨大地震が世界に報じられた直後から,アメリカ,ドイツ,フランスから原子力発電の専門家派遣の申し出がありながら,それらがいずれもチェルノブイリやスリーマイル島方式の,廃炉→コンクリート遮蔽であったため,政府と東電はそれらを謝絶したと報じられています.

しかし,周辺地域への放射能汚染の危険性,あるいは原乳や野菜の汚染が報じられる事態になっても,東北に設置した原子炉についてあらかじめ用意されていてしかるべきであった地元電力会社からのバックアップ電源を泥縄で引っ張るのに10日も要しては,それもどこまで使い物になるのでしょう?

ここまで放射能汚染の危険性が広がった状況で,東京電力は多くの人的,物的資源の投入を続けていったい福島第1原発を最終的にどう処理しようとしているのでしょう.

復旧作業という言葉が踊っていますが,復旧(以前の状態に回復する)など誰が可能だと信じているのでしょう.事故直後から米国のマス・メディアは危機(world crisis)の深刻さを連日大きく報じるとともに、日本政府や東電が危機を過小評価しようとしていると批判し,それが日本社会の“隠ぺい体質”に根ざすと疑いの目を向ける分析も少なくないのです.   

誰の目にも,海水を投入した原子炉は廃炉が必然的な処理法だとするなら,明らかな選択肢は,福島第1原発の速やかな廃炉→コンクリート遮蔽 しかないのではありませんか!!!

外国紙には,東京電力が既にコンクリート遮蔽の準備を進めていると報じられているのです.

政府主導の演出にのみ熱心な政府や東京電力は,速やかに主体性を発揮して,最終処理方針を明確化すべきですし,その迅速な実行を切望するモノです.

時間や人材,物材を,すべてが想定外だったという不確実性のなかで,いつまでも無用に使い続けるのは,この非常事態には許されることではないはずです.

これを教訓に,早急にやるべき事は,日本中の電力の相互融通システム構築ではないでしょうか. 東西で交流電流のサイクルの違いはありますが,それは技術的に解決可能でしょう.         もう1点,東京電力や政府が明確化すべきは,計画停電なるものは文字通り計画的であるべきですから,一体いつごろそれを解消できるのかを情報公開すべきです.

緊急事態は,本来,緊急に解消されるべきモノです.                              私はかねて日本経済の支え手として外国人を大量に招聘することを主張していますが,既にダラダラと続けられる日本の緊急事態;深刻化する汚染や先の見えない計画停電に愛想を尽かした在日外国人のエクソダスが始まっていると報道されているのは,まことに残念でなりません.

 

追 記巨大地震後2週間の3月25日夜,管首相がメッセージを読み上げた後,短時間,質疑に応じていましたが,記者の「福島原発をどうするのか?」という質問に,BBC World News は次のような答えを報じていました,  
In a televised address, Prime Minister Kan said: "The current situation is still very unpredictable. We're working to stop the situation from worsening. We need to continue to be extremely vigilant."                                       「状況は未だまったく予測困難であり,今は状況の悪化を止めるのに懸命になっている.さらに大変注意深く警戒を続けなければならない.」                                     これが一国の首相のまともな答弁といえるでしょうか???  

なお,BBC World News のタイトルは,                                      Japan investigation into nuclear plant radiation leak                                    です,


nice!(0)  コメント(0)  トラックバック(0) 
共通テーマ:音楽

消滅の危機から復活のToronto Symphony [音楽時評]

このToronto Symphony の復活の主役が,Tokyo String Quartet で一時期メンバーだった Peter Oundjian(Violin) であったという記述に興味を覚えて,この記事を取り上げました.
小澤征爾も一時この楽団に身を寄せたことがあったはずです.

                                                                                                                      Toronto Symphony は1990年代に一度労働紛争に見舞われて,ほとんど消滅したかに見えたOrchestra ですが,丁度左手の故障で,東京クァルテットを離れたOundjian が,指揮者転向を考えていた時期と重なって,2002年にその指揮者に迎えられてから著しい躍進を遂げて,アメリカ大陸で一流の域に達したと認められるに至っています.

Its roller-coaster ride was in general perhaps no wilder than that of most other North American orchestras in the 20th century, but as the Toronto Symphony entered the 21st, many were giving it up for dead. とあるように,1度は皆が死んだと思ったほどだったのです.

                                                                                                                        The previous decade had been a particularly tough haul. Responding to threats of bankruptcy in the mid-1990s the players had taken a 15 percent salary cut, but when their contract expired in 1999, they staged a 74-day strike, complete with the usual animosities and budgetary strains. Then in 2001, with little more than a year’s notice, the Finnish conductor Jukka-Pekka Saraste, who had been the orchestra’s music director since 1994, left.

The Rebirth of an Orchestra” ...when Peter Oundjian took over as music director. The signs of rebirth that it trumpeted were evidently audible when the Toronto Symphony last appeared at Carnegie Hall, in 2008. Allan Kozinn, in The New York Times, found it to be “in superb shape.”

最初は団員とのもめ事もあったようです.He conducted often, and although there were early grumbles from players about his raw technique, few could question his musicianship or the force of his personality. と受け容れられていったようです.

コンサートマスターと最初は確執があったそうですが,弓の bowing を巡って自分でやって見せたことから信頼を勝ち得たといいます.その後コンマスは定年退職し,目下その他を含め,数人の欠員だそうですが,

“Under Mr. Oundjian,” he said, “the orchestra has maintained its shine, but now it packs a firm punch as well.” As it prepares to return to Carnegie on Saturday evening, the Toronto Symphony appears to be flourishing at a time when many North American ensembles are struggling.

 

Orchestra, Back From the Brink
Ryan Hughes for The New York Times
Peter Oundjian, the Music Director of The Toronto Symphony Orchestra, in rehearsal at Roy Thomson Hall.
                                      Ryan Hughes for The New York Times                                                                                          
Peter Oundjian, the Music Director of The Toronto Symphony Orchestra.

                                                                                                                                                            THE cryptic title of Richard S. Warren’s history of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra, “Begins With the Oboe,” refers to the note A that the principal oboist of a symphony orchestra traditionally sounds to give the other players concert pitch. When the book was published in 2002 (University of Toronto Press), different titles might have suggested themselves: for one, “Ends With a Whimper.”  

Mr. Warren, the orchestra’s archivist from 1976 to his death in 2002, dutifully chronicled the artistic and financial ups and downs of the Toronto Symphony, which recently announced its 2011-12 season, its 90th. (Better to take that number on faith than to try to puzzle through the orchestra’s discontinuous history, which is traced to 1908 despite abortive earlier efforts and a period under the name New Symphony Orchestra.) Its roller-coaster ride was in general perhaps no wilder than that of most other North American orchestras in the 20th century, but as the Toronto Symphony entered the 21st, many were giving it up for dead.

Even Mr. Warren, who was not among them, titled the last chapter of his book “Toward the Unknown” and headed it with a fretful epigraph from Whitman:

... toward the unknown region,

where neither ground is for the feet, nor any path to follow?

No map, there, nor guide,

Nor voice sounding....

The previous decade had been a particularly tough haul. Responding to threats of bankruptcy in the mid-1990s the players had taken a 15 percent salary cut, but when their contract expired in 1999, they staged a 74-day strike, complete with the usual animosities and budgetary strains. Then in 2001, with little more than a year’s notice, the Finnish conductor Jukka-Pekka Saraste, who had been the orchestra’s music director since 1994, left. His tenure, Mr. Warren wrote, “had been one of administrative turmoil.” Now the orchestra was in deep financial waters and essentially rudderless.

The next major public look at the orchestra’s condition came in 2005, with the documentary film “Five Days in September: The Rebirth of an Orchestra” (now on DVD from Rhombus), based on the opening week of the 2004 season, when Peter Oundjian took over as music director. The signs of rebirth that it trumpeted were evidently audible when the Toronto Symphony last appeared at Carnegie Hall, in 2008. Allan Kozinn, in The New York Times, found it to be “in superb shape.”

“Under Mr. Oundjian,” he said, “the orchestra has maintained its shine, but now it packs a firm punch as well.”

As it prepares to return to Carnegie on Saturday evening, the Toronto Symphony appears to be flourishing at a time when many North American ensembles are struggling. On my recent visit here, for the opening of a lively annual contemporary-music festival, New Creations, instituted by Mr. Oundjian immediately on his arrival, the orchestra sounded excellent in concert and in rehearsal, and it had clearly tapped into an enthusiastic and notably young audience.

Mr. Oundjian, now 55, seems to have been a canny choice to direct the orchestra. A violinist born in Toronto and educated in London and New York, he played first fiddle in the Tokyo String Quartet during its heyday, from 1981 to 1996, when he was forced to give up steady performance because of a repetitive-stress injury to his left hand. With some training as a conductor in his background, he decided to take up the baton.

His first prominent podium appearance was at the Caramoor International Music Festival in Katonah, N.Y., in 1996, conducting the resident Orchestra of St. Luke’s as a late substitute for an indisposed André Previn. He became artistic director of the festival from 1997 to 2002, and artistic adviser from 2003 to 2007. He conducted often, and although there were early grumbles from players about his raw technique, few could question his musicianship or the force of his personality.

All this proved attractive to Andrew R. Shaw, who, as the Toronto Symphony’s president and chief executive since 2002, was the one who had to find a way out of the stagnant interregnum. Even Mr. Oundjian’s relative inexperience with major orchestras at a slightly advanced age was useful.

“Peter had music in his bones,” Mr. Shaw said in an interview at the orchestra’s offices in a stately building across King Street from its performance home, Roy Thomson Hall. “He had the highest standards. All this requires a little bit of gray hair, but he also had an enthusiasm to grow. He wasn’t in a position to say, ‘Oh, another music directorship.’ He wants to grow as a music director.”

Mr. Shaw, who was himself something of an outsider to orchestras, having worked in music publishing and education, is in large part the explanation for what happened between the book’s gloomy ending and the film’s highly charged opening. In addition to hiring Mr. Oundjian, he provided a wealth of fresh ideas on different ways to present concerts for expanded audiences.

“Five Days in September” depicts Mr. Oundjian as a dynamo. Early on, in a prickly private dispute (oops, no longer private) with the longtime concertmaster Jacques Israelievitch over a bowing in Rachmaninoff’s “Symphonic Dances,” Mr. Oundjian reaches for Mr. Israelievitch’s instrument to demonstrate. “Are you going to show me up?” Mr. Israelievitch asks.

Mr. Oundjian does take the instrument and demonstrate, and — as conductors will — he evidently wins the argument. He is next heard telling the orchestra: “If you don’t like the bowing, you blame me, because it’s my bowing. But I love it.”

Conciliatory remarks follow in the film, and Mr. Israelievitch offers a rosy summation: “In the end, you know, I think the soup is going to turn out quite delicious.” Presumably his retirement in 2008 simply reflected a fullness of time.

The orchestra has been without a permanent concertmaster since, though a search is said to be proceeding promisingly. With four or five other vacancies to fill, the orchestra is now operating with a streamlined membership of 88.

But Mr. Oundjian has a fondness for blockbuster works, as the first CDs on the orchestra’s new TSO Live label show. They include Bruckner’s Fourth Symphony, Mahler’s Fourth, Shostakovich’s Seventh and, just out, Holst’s “Planets.” Like New York, Toronto has a rich pool of fine freelance musicians who can be hired as extras.

“I’m only worried when I start to see too many people I don’t recognize,” Mr. Oundjian said in an interview, though in truth he didn’t seem worried at all.

Not that success has come easily or cheaply. In addition to streamlining in personnel and other areas, funds have had to be raised in economic times scarcely less difficult in Canada than they have been in the United States. On an annual budget of $23 million, the orchestra reported a deficit of $483,000 last June, relatively modest these days. And its endowment is not huge, some $27 million. More government financing is available in Canada: about 25 to 30 percent of the budget, said Mr. Shaw, the president. But “the Canadian context for philanthropy is difficult,” he added, “more conservative, less aggressive.”

In trying to pry funds from donors, Mr. Shaw could hardly have found a more useful ally than the unfailingly personable Mr. Oundjian. “Peter could talk almost anybody into anything,” said Andrew McCandless, the superb principal trumpeter.

Mr. McCandless should know. He was one, he admits, who had written off the orchestra’s future a decade ago. “I ran for my life,” he said. He took a job with the Dallas Symphony, and one of Mr. Oundjian’s early achievements was to coax him back to Toronto.

Mr. McCandless seemed to speak for many (and others spoke for themselves) when he described how happy he was to be working with Mr. Oundjian. Against all odds, the honeymoon between music director and players has apparently lasted these seven years.

And audiences respond to Mr. Oundjian’s festivals (Mozart as well as contemporary music) and to his onstage commentary and explications. They have also turned out for the concerts of different lengths at unconventional starting times that Mr. Shaw has devised to suit varied lifestyles. His dream, he said, is to have one-hour concerts at any time of the day.

Given this sea of good will, it seems unkind to point out that common wisdom nowadays holds that a music directorship almost inevitably turns stale after 10 years.

Mr. Oundjian, who was principal guest conductor of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra from 2006 to 2010, and who recently accepted the additional post of music director of the Royal Scottish National Orchestra in Glasgow as of next year, expresses no desire to leave his hometown.

“I don’t think about my career that much,” Mr. Oundjian said. “It’s much more important for me to have an impact on the community. I will know when it’s time to move away.”

In the meantime everyone seems to be enjoying artistic prosperity, without taking anything for granted. “We can’t figure out what we’re doing right,” said the Canadian composer Gary Kulesha, who works closely with Mr. Oundjian in planning the New Creations festival. “If we could bottle it, we’d be rich.”

But with New Creations as with their many other innovations, Mr. Oundjian and Mr. Shaw seem to know precisely what they are doing. And given what they have already accomplished, who could be surprised if they found a way to bottle it?


nice!(0)  コメント(0)  トラックバック(0) 
共通テーマ:音楽

この広告は前回の更新から一定期間経過したブログに表示されています。更新すると自動で解除されます。